Federal contract vehicle · fss
Sin: 132 60FSUPPORTS Planning, Risk Assessment, Deployment, Implementation and Integrationservices for Customer Agency Applications, Including Operations and Customer Service, for Both Certificate-based and Non-certificate-based Applications. Technical Evaluation Criteria Are: - Documented Experience With Deployment of Policy-compliant Identity and Access Management Projects in Government Agencies. This Includes Iam Technologies and Standards, Including Security Assertion Markup Language (saml), Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and the Ws-federation Specification. Offerors Should Describe in Detail Their Competencies When Proposing Under This Sin. - Offerors Must Describe Their Involvement in at Least 2 Prior Federal Government Application Deployment Projects for Public-facing It Systems. Identity and Access Management Professional Services - Subject to Cooperative Purchasing Identity and Access Management Professional Services - Subje
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…