Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Predict Mental Health Risk Among Youth Presenting to Rural Primary Care Clinics - Project Summary This Study, in Response to RFA-MH-25-195, Aims to Enhance, Deploy, and Rigorously Validate the Duke Predictive Model of Adolescent Mental Health (duke-pma), Which Uses a Novel Clinical Signature Derived From Affordable, Accessible Measures to Identify Youth at High Risk for Psychiatric Illness in Primary Care Settings. the Duke-pma, a Neural Network-based Predictive Tool, Has Already Demonstrated High Accuracy in Predicting Psychiatric Risk One Year in Advance in Youth Aged 10-15, Using Data From the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Notably, Sleep Disturbances Have Emerged as a Key Modifiable Predictor in the Model. Unlike Most Predictive Models That Rely on Current Symptoms to Anticipate Outcomes, the Duke-pma Bases Its Predictions on Underlying Disease Mechanisms and Protective Factors, Making It Better Suited to Inform Preventive Interventions. Furthermore, the Model Identifies an Elevated P-factor, a General Measure of Psychopathology That Spans Multiple Psychiatric Conditions, Making It Broadly Applicable Across Diverse Youth Populations. Our Project Will Begin by Optimizing the Duke-pma Through the Incorporation of Behavioral Tasks From the Nih Toolbox to Enhance Its Prediction Performance. Following Duke Ai Health’s Algorithm-based Clinical Decision Support Oversight Framework, We Will Ensure the Model Adheres to the Highest Standards of Transparency, Quality, and Equity. Additionally, We Will Apply Trustworthy Ai Techniques Designed to Reduce Effects of Distribution Shifts on Model Performance to Ensure the Model Remains Effective and Equitable Across Diverse Clinical Settings and Demographic Groups. After Optimization, the Duke-pma Will Be Deployed in Rural Primary Care and Pediatric Clinics, Where Access to Mental Health Services and Research Participation Is Often Limited. We Will Enroll 2,000 Youth From Rural Clinics in the Southeast and Midwest, Partnering With the Science, Technology, and Research (STAR) Clinical Research Network. We Will Also Explore the Benefit of Adding a Measure of Home Environments to the Duke-pma Through Digital Envirotyping, Which Uses an Ai-driven Approach to Assess Home Environments Remotely Without Requiring In-person Visits, Making It Much More Resource-efficient and Accessible Than Current Approaches. Model Performance Will Be Validated Through Psychiatric Diagnostics Conducted One Year After the Initial Assessment. If Successful, This Project Has the Potential to Transform Mental Health Resource Allocation Particularly in Underserved Communities by Offering an Accessible, Low-cost, Data-driven Approach to Identify Vulnerable Youth and Highlight Modifiable Risk Factors for Early Intervention.
Committed
$15.0 Million
Paid out
$497.0K
3%
Committed, not yet paid
$14.5M
97%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.