Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Methods to Improve Efficiency and Robustness of Clinical Trials Using Information From Real-world Data With Hidden Bias - Project Summary/abstract Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTS) Are the Gold-standard Method of Evaluating the Safety and Ef- Cacy of Treatments for Diseases, Such as Cancer and Neurological Disorders. Due to Disease Hetero- Geneity, Disease Rarity, or Enrollment Disparities, There Are Limited Patients Available for Clinical Trials, Making Drug Development Costly and Time-consuming With Trials Failing at a High Rate. the 21ST Century Cures Act Has Called for Regulatory Agencies and Drug Developers to Consider Innovative Clinical Trial Designs That Bridge Conventional Clinical Trials With Real-world Data (RWD) to Overcome Some of These Limitations. External Controls (ECS) From RWD Have Been Used to Construct the Comparator Arm in Con- Rmatory Trials That Eventually Received Approval From Regulatory Decision-makers. However, Concerns Regarding the Validity and Comparability of RWD With RCTS Have Limited Their Use in a Broader Context Thus Far. Selection Bias, Differences in Variable Denitions, and Unmeasured Confounding Can Lead to Biased Treatment Effect Estimates and Incorrect Inference If RWD Are Integrated With RCTS. the Aims in This Project Focus on Addressing Hidden Biases When Integrating RWD to Improve the Efciency of Clinical Trials. We Will Develop a Novel Sensitivity Analysis Framework for the Use of External Real-world Controls to Assess the Robustness of Results to Hidden Biases, as Well as Robust and Efcient Analysis Methods That Selectively Borrow and Adjust for Data Discrepancies to Mitigate the Impact of Hidden Bi- Ases. We Will Actively Engage in Dissemination and Translation of These New Methods to Researchers From Industry, Academic and Regulatory Agencies Through Exemplary Applications, State-of-art Software, Statistical Analysis Plan Template, Resourceful Website, and Workshops and Tutorial Sessions. Our Ulti- Mate Goal Is to Facilitate More Robust Use of Real-world Evidence in Regulatory Decision-making.
Committed
$2.5 Million
Paid out
$1.4M
57%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.1M
43%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.