Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Defining the Mechanisms of Hiv Resistance to Bnabs in Humans - Project Summary Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Revolutionized the Treatment and Prevention of HIV-1 Infection. However, Art Does Not Eradicate Established Infection and Worldwide HIV-1 Incidence Rates Remain High and Have Been Declining Slowly. Thus, the Search for Novel Preventive and Therapeutic Interventions Remains a High Priority. in Recent Years, Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies (BNABS) Emerged as a Long-acting Alternative to Daily Art and as a Promising Strategy to Achieve Long-term Treatment-free HIV-1 Control. Bnabs Differ From Art in That They Engage the Host Immune System by Virtue of Their FC Effector Domains and Therefore Have the Potential to Mediate Killing of Infected Cells and Modulate or Enhance Hiv-specific Immune Responses. However, Bnabs Are Vulnerable to Escape by HIV-1 Variants. During HIV-1 Infection, Antibody Responses Co-evolve With a Large Population of Rapidly Mutating Viruses, Such That Variants That Are Resistant to Individual Antibodies Are Frequently Encountered. Consistent With This High Level of Diversity, Several Clinical Studies Have Demonstrated That Bnab Monotherapy Leads to Transient Declines in Viremia With Rapid Selection of Bnab-resistant Viral Strains. in Contrast, a Combination of Two Bnabs Targeting Non-overlapping Env Epitopes Maintained Viral Suppression in Participants Harboring Antibody Sensitive Viruses Who Had Achieved Viral Suppression With Art and Subsequently Received Repeated Doses of Bnabs During Art Interruption. These Early Studies Demonstrate the Potential Therapeutic Application of Bnabs But Also Highlight the Need to Better Understand Viral Escape Pathways Leading to Bnab Resistance. Although Resistance to Some Bnabs (i.e. ANTI-V3 Loop) Is Predicated on Known Features of Env, the Determinants of Resistance Are Poorly Defined for Other Bnabs and for Combinations of Bnabs. the Overarching Goals of This Proposal Are to Understand the Diversity of Pathways Leading to Bnab Escape and Use This Information to Guide the Design of More Effective Optimized Bnab Combinations That Prevent Emergence of Resistant Variants. This Proposal Has Four Interrelated Aims Directed at Accomplishing These Goals: (1) Determine the Sequence Elements That Lead to Viral Resistance to Bnab Administration in Humans Using Newly Developed Next Generation Deep Sequencing Methods; (2) Systematically Map All Possible Viable Bnab Resistance Mutations to Identify Mechanisms of Escape Across Viral Strains and Subtypes by Producing and Testing Complete Libraries of Env Mutants; (3) Determine the Nature of Clinically Relevant Bnab-resistant HIV-1 Variants That Can Be Selected in Cell Culture in the Presence or Absence of Autologous Serum; (4) Develop Computational Models That Define Mechanisms of HIV-1 Bnab Resistance by Integrating the Sequence Information Obtained From Aims 1-3.
Committed
$7.8 Million
Paid out
$5.8M
74%
Committed, not yet paid
$2.0M
26%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.