Federal grant · project grant (b)
Dissecting Modular and Redundant Organization of Cortical Circuits - Abstract in Many Cognitive Processes, Information Is Processed in a Parallel Manner Across Many Brain Regions. This Is Thought to Make Our Cognitive Abilities Highly Tolerant to Perturbations or Neuron-loss Because Disrupted Processes Are Compensated by Other Redundant Neurons Coding the Same Information. Yet, It Remains Poorly Understood How Interconnected Networks of Neurons Are Organized Into Redundant Representations to Produce Robustness. We Recently Discovered That Persistent Activity in Mouse Frontal Cortex During Short-term Memory Is Remarkably Robust to Perturbations. the Two Hemispheres of Cortex Are Organized Into Redundant Modules Where Each One Can Independently Maintain Persistent Activity. When One Suffers a Perturbation, Signals From the Other Hemisphere Help Restore the Activity. Modularity and Redundancy May Be a General Organizing Principle of Information Processing and Storage in Cortical Circuits. Understanding the Neurobiology of This Novel and Potentially Fundamental Organizing Principle Will Have Deep Implications for Design of Neural Manipulation Strategies and Understanding Behavioral Manifestation of Chronic Neurodegeneration. in the Proposed Research, We Will Establish and Validate a Novel Framework That Combines Computational Modeling, Population Recording, and Targeted Optogenetic Perturbations to Identify, Probe, and Chronically Track Modular Organization of Cortical Circuits. Our Goal Is to Dissect Redundant Modular Organizations Within and Across Brain Areas, Obtain a Deeper Understanding of How Multiple Redundant Modules Coordinate Information to Support Robust Behavior, and How Such Modular Organization Is Shaped by Learning to Manifests in Robust Behavior.
Committed
$2.5 Million
Paid out
$1.8M
74%
Committed, not yet paid
$659.9K
26%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…