Federal grant · project grant (b)
American Library Association?s Public Programs Office Will Use a Planning Grant to Identify and Address Gaps in Equipping Library Professionals With the Education and Skills Needed to Build and Execute Community-responsive Public Programming in Libraries. Building Off of the Imls-funded National Impact of Library Public Programs Assessment (nilppa), the Project Team Hopes to Further Illuminate and Address Gaps in Programming Training in Order to Build a Library Workforce That Can Better Support the Public. This Process Will Include: 1. a Landscape Review of Programming Course Syllabi Currently Being Taught in Mlis Programs and in Professional Development Nationwide; 2. Facilitated Conversations Between 12 Library Field Advisors That Include Programming Librarians, Mlis Programming Course Instructors, and Continuing Education Content Providers From the Field to Discuss Strengths, Weaknesses, Gaps, and Opportunities in Current Offerings; 3. Consideration of Further Alignment With the Nilppa Core Library Programming Competencies; and 4. Publication of Recommendations to Create Programming-specific Curriculum for the Library Field.
Committed
$99,726
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…