Federal grant · project grant (b)
Public Libraries Face a Pressing Need to Evaluate Their Offerings and Use the Resulting Evidence to Inform Internal Decision-making. the Research Institute for Public Libraries (RIPL) Has Trained Nearly 1,370 Library Staff Nationwide on Introductory Evaluation. the Califa Group - in Partnership With the Colorado State Library, State Library of North Carolina, Rebecca Teasdale & Associates, LLC and LH Evaluation & Training Group - Will Build Off Ripl?s Success by Developing and Piloting a Nine-month Cohort-based Peer Learning Process to Further Advance Evaluation Skills, Knowledge, and Attitudes. Each Cohort Will Evaluate a Library Program or Service and Produce Empirical Evidence to Support Internal Decision-making. at Least 30 Public Library Staff Members, Representing 15 Public Libraries in Three States, Will Complete the Cohort Experience. the Project Will Also Produce a Library of at Least 20 Coaching Videos That Will Be Available for Free on the Project Website, Infopeople Platform, and the Ripl Community of Practice.
Committed
$247,589
Paid out
$234.6K
95%
Committed, not yet paid
$13.0K
5%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…