Federal grant · project grant (b)
In Recent Years Concerns From the Library Field Have Emerged With the Proliferation of Surveys Aiming to Gather Timely, Reliable, Comparable and Meaningful Data on Public Libraries. Primary Among Them Are That the Burden of Increased Data Collection Is Beyond the Capacity of Many Libraries, That Efforts Are Not Coordinated, and That the Data Collected Does Not Reflect the Needs nor Tell the Story of Libraries in the 21ST Century. There Is No Overarching National Plan for the Collection, Storage, Use and Dissemination of Public Library Data and Service Outcomes. Cosla Proposes a Cooperative Agreement With Imls to Build Bridges Between Current Data Collection Activities to Ensure Sustainability and Long-term Access, to Resolve Concerns Related to Duplication of Efforts and to Create a Comprehensive and Cooperative Approach to Library Data That Addresses the Importance of Outcomes in Addition to Outputs and Indicators.
Committed
$745,110
Paid out
$613.7K
82%
Committed, not yet paid
$131.4K
18%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…