Federal grant · project grant (b)
Ovasafe: a Microfluidic Device Enabling Automated Oocyte Vitrification - Abstract in the United States, the Total Number of In-vitro Fertilization (IVF) Clinics Has Stayed Relatively Stagnant Through the Past Decade, and the Ivf-cycles Per Million Women Remains Significantly Lower Than in Other Developed Countries. the Greatest Challenge for Widespread Use of Ivf Includes Its High Cost, Driven by the Need for Complex and Expensively Equipped Ivf Laboratories and Highly-trained Embryologists. the High Cost and Accessibility of Ivf Clinics Is the Leading Reason Why Couples Are Unable to Undergo or Delay Ivf Treatment And/or Egg Banking. Our Company’s Goal Is to Automate Various Functions Within an Embryology Lab to Decrease the Cost and Improve the Overall Accessibility of Ivf Treatments and Fertility Preservation. We Are Aiming to Achieve This by Reducing the Equipment and Personnel Requirements So as to Pave the Way Towards De-centralization of Ivf. Towards This Goal, Our Proposed New Technology “ovasafe” Will Facilitate Vitrification of Oocytes Prior to Them Being Transferred to Central Embryology Labs for Fertilization or Long-term Storage Facilities for Preservation. Ovasafe Will Complement the Ongoing Project, Ovaready, Which Automatically Prepares Oocytes for Vitrification. Ovasafe Will Utilize Microfluidic Devices to Load Cryoprotectant Agents (CPA) Rapidly and Gradually to Oocytes, and Automatically Transfer the Oocytes Into Silica Capillary Carriers Prior to Them Being Plunged Into Liquid Nitrogen to Complete the Vitrification Process. in Addition to Improving the Accessibility by Enabling Processing of Gametes at Satellite Clinics, Performing Gradual Cpa Loading Using Microfluidic Devices Will Reduce the Cpa Exposure, Toxicity, and Osmotic Stress to Oocytes. Automated Cpa Loading and Utilization of a Closed Vitrification Carrier Will Eliminate Variations Between Operators and Clinics. Although the Scope of This Proposal Is Limited to Oocyte Vitrification, the Technology Can Also Be Applicable to Embryo Vitrification in the Future. in Our Preliminary Studies, We Demonstrated That Gradual Cpa Loading Using Microfluidics and Silica Capillary Vitrification Are Both Practical Methods Which Can Improve Vitrification Outcomes. We Showed That Gradual Cpa Loading Decreases the Total Cpa Exposure to Oocytes, and Reduces the Osmotic Stress Driven by Cell Shrinkage Which Is a Response to Standard Step-wise Cpa Loading Protocols. We Also Demonstrated That Silica Capillaries Can Achieve Ultra-rapid Cooling and Warming Rates That Are Comparable to Standard Open Carrier Methods, and the Vitrification Outcomes With Silica Capillaries Are Comparable or Superior to Standard Methods. in the Proposed Work, We Will Build on These Innovations and Integrate Both Methods in a Simple, Reliable, and Closed System to Automate the Oocyte Vitrification Process. Through This Fast-track Application, We Propose and Plan to Complete the Following Aims in This Order: Develop a Microfluidic Cpa Loading Device; Modify Cpa Loading Device for Automated Oocyte Loading to Silica Capillaries; Have Plastic Microfluidic Devices and Customized Silica Capillaries Manufactured to Improve Usability; Design and Build an Automated Control System; Demonstrate Success of the Automated Workflow With Vitrification of Mouse and Donated Human Oocytes.
Committed
$2.4 Million
Paid out
$2.3M
99%
Committed, not yet paid
$30.0K
1%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.