Federal grant · project grant (b)
Method for the Validation by Western Analysis of Affinity Reagents Against Post-translationally Modified Proteins. - Abstract Antibodies (ABS) Are Commonly Employed in Biomedical Research to Identify and Quantify Target Proteins. However, the Specificity, Sensitivity and Reliability of These Abs Can Be Variable, Which Is a Significant Concern in the Scientific Community. the Use of an Incorrect Ab Can Result in Misleading or Inaccurate Results, Impeding Progress in Various Areas of Biomedical Research. in Phase I of This Project, We Developed Tools to Validate the Specificity of Commercial Abs Used to Detect Phosphorylated Sites in Proteins in a Method We Developed and Published That We Named Milkshake. We Will Present Some of These Results From This Phase I Effort, Which Demonstrates the Critical Need to Address This Concern. This Proposed Sbir Phase Ii Project Aims to Both Extend and Commercialize the Phase I Effort. We Will Continue the Ab Validation Work Initiated in Phase I by Extending the Analysis to Other Types of Post-translational Modifications (PTMS) of Proteins in Western Analysis and Flow Cytometry. This Phase Ii Project Also Seeks to Improve and Scale This Pipeline Further, and to Develop New Methods for Validating Abs Against Glycosylated Proteins, Which Are Often Dynamic and Challenging to Detect Using Traditional Techniques. We Will Also Employ an Innovative Tool for Measuring Ab Promiscuity Using a Technology We Term ‘sundae’ to Better Investigate the Specificity of the Ab Paratope. Sundae Will Be Demonstrated for Two Therapeutic Abs. the Phase Ii Project Has Several Key Objectives, Including the Development of New Ab-specific Assays and the Establishment of a Centralized Database for Sharing Validated Ab Data. the Project Team Comprises Experts in Ab Validation, Proteomics, and Molecular Biology, and Will Collaborate Closely With Our Current and Future Industry Partners and Academic Researchers to Ensure Our Success.
Committed
$2.2 Million
Paid out
$1.6M
72%
Committed, not yet paid
$631.3K
28%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.