Federal grant · project grant (b)
Multiplex and Multi-omic Diagnostic Test for Bladder Cancer Recurrence - Following Initial Diagnosis and Treatment, Bladder Cancer Has a High Recurrence Rate, Making It One of the Most Expensive Cancers to Treat Over a Patient’s Lifetime. the Current Standard of Care Testing for Bladder Cancer Recurrence Is an Invasive Medical Procedure, Cystoscopy. Urine Contains a Wealth of Biomarkers That Can Potentially Be Used to Monitor for Signs of Recurrence and Early Initiation of Treatment. However, Commercially Available Biomarker-based Bladder Cancer Tests Rely on a Single Type of Biomarker, Are Insufficiently Sensitive, Often Yield False Negative and False Positive Results, and Are Time and Resource Intensive. Therefore, the Development of New Approaches That Afford High Accuracy Results Are the Key to Improving Patient Care and Treatment. to Meet This Need, Early Is Good Developed a Bladder Cancer Diagnostic Assay, Called BCDX. BCDX Uses Advanced Nanotechnology to Detect Twelve Different Biomarkers Directly From a Urine Sample. the Comprehensive Approach Is Multi-omic Multiplex Because It Measures the Concentration of Proteins, Mirnas, Mrnas, and Lncrnas. Feasibility Studies Demonstrated Attomolar Sensitivity for Each Biomarker, With High Positive Predictive and Negative Predictive Values for Biomarkers That Are Present in Picomolar Concentrations in Urine Samples Derived From Healthy Volunteers and Bladder Cancer Patients. Moreover, BCDX Can Distinguish Healthy Versus Oncogenic Samples and Can Discriminate Between Low Grade and High-grade Tumors. in a Pilot Clinical Study, BCDX Demonstrated Diagnostic Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity. the Goal of This Proposal Is to Execute a Clinical Validation Study That Is Designed to Complete the Acquisition of Data Required by the Fda for Regulatory Clearance Through the 510(K) Pathway. Beyond Setting the State for Regulatory Clearance, Phase Ii Completion Is Expected to Help Promote the Adoption of BCDX by Clinicians and Healthcare Professionals and to Secure Reimbursement From Payers.
Committed
$1.7 Million
Paid out
$1.0M
63%
Committed, not yet paid
$606.8K
37%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.