Federal grant · project grant (b)
Technology Assisted Treatment for Binge Eating Behavior - Abstract Significance: Binge-eating Behavior Is Characterized by the Consumption of a Large Amount of Food and Accompanied by the Subjective Experience of Loss of Control. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Has Been Shown to Be Effective, But CBT and Other Options for Binge Eating Are Limited Because Treatment Is Not Effective in All Patients, and Because of High Rates of Relapse and Attrition. a Key Reason for the Limited Effectiveness of Treatments Is Restrictive Eating Following a Binge-eating Episode, Which Is a Good Opportunity to Deploy CBT Strategies Designed to Encourage a Return to a Normal Eating Schedule. Hypothesis: It Is Hypothesized That a Smartwatch App Can Be Designed for Use in Treating Binge Eating Disorder Using Just-in-time Adaptive Interventions (jitais). Smartwatches With Sophisticated Motion Sensors and Capable of Deploying Powerful Machine Learning Algorithms Can Be Trained to Passively Detect Not Only Eating, But the Qualities That Differentiate an Individual’s Binge Eating Behavior From His/her Normal Eating Behavior. CBT Strategies Can Then Be Surfaced to the User After a Binge Eating Episode to Encourage the Patient to Resume Healthy Eating Patterns. Moreover, the Device Can Be Used to Obtain an Objective Report of Binge Eating Episodes, as Well as Identify Each User’s Patterns of Antecedents to the Binge Episodes. Preliminary Data: the Investigative Team Has Trained a Machine Learning Model Capable of Detecting Eating in Free Living Situations, Showing 23/23 Accurately Detected Eating Sessions in 60 Hours of Data Captured Across 7 Participants. Further, It Shows That Two Binge-eating Sessions Had Differentiated Characteristics in Rate and Duration of Eating From the Normal Eating Sessions. the Team Also Has Deployed Adaptive Interventions Successfully in Several Projects Relating to Problematic Eating. Patient and Clinician Survey Respondents Agree the Concept Could Be Useful in Averting Binge-eating Episodes. Specific Aim 1: the Eating Detection Model Will Be Improved and Validated Using Data From Patients Who Routinely Binge Eat. After This Validation, It Will Be Deployed Across Binge Eating Patients to Determine the Identifying Characteristics of Binge Eating. Specific Aim 2: Develop the Smartwatch App as a Jitai System for Delivering CBT , With Consultation From Expert Clinicians and End Users. Specific Aim 3: the Team Will Conduct an Initial Feasibility, Usability and Acceptability Test of the Habitaware Device to Determine Next Steps and Progress to a Phase Ii Proposal. Long-term Goal: After Developing Passive Means of Identifying Binge Eating, We Will Study the Antecedents to Binge Episodes in a Phase Ii, Which Would Allow Us to Predict Binge Episodes Further in Advance and Divert the Patient Away From the Harmful Behavior. We Will Also Extend the App to Share Data With a Clinician.
Committed
$819,456
Paid out
$615.0K
75%
Committed, not yet paid
$204.4K
25%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.