Federal grant · project grant (b)
The Next-generation Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (DART) Assay Using High-content Analysis of Genetically Diverse C. Elegans Populations - Abstract: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology (DART) Studies Are Commonly Conducted Using a Large Number of Genetically Inbred Rodent and Rabbit Strains to Predict Adverse Effects of Chemicals on Human Health. While in Vitro or Ex Vivo Methods Are Used in Early Drug Discovery Fields, They Face Several Challenges for Dart Studies Due to Lack of System-level Biology, Multi-organ Physiology, and Male/female Reproductive Organs. C. Elegans Is a Genetically and Molecularly Attractive Model Organism That Provides Many Advantages for High-throughput Dart Studies, Including a High Degree of Conserved Genes and Biochemical Pathways, a Well-defined and Characterized Reproductive System, a Rapid Life and Reproductive Cycle, and Low Maintenance Costs. While C. Elegans Based Assays Show a Significant Agreement With Higher Mammals (rat and Rabbit), There Is an Urgent Need for More Sensitive Assays to Improve Both Sensitivity and Specificity for Wide Acceptance of C. Elegans as an Alternative Animal Model for Dart Testing. the Goal of This Proposal Is to Demonstrate the First C. Elegans Based High-content Dart Assay to Analyze Multiple Phenotypes That Will Reduce False Negatives and Capture Interindividual Toxicology Responses From a Panel of Genetically Diverse Strains. Newormics’ Vivochip Technology Is the Only Screening Platform That Can Provide High-resolution Imaging of C. Elegans Strains at High Throughputs. It Will Allow Us to Assess Accurately Multiple Endpoints, Such as the Feeding Behavior, Body Size, Vulva Development, Animal Stress, and Embryo Health in Non-anesthetized Adults. With Multi-parametric Dart Analysis Using Genetic Backgrounds, We Can Reduce the Occurrence of Seemingly Disparate Experimental Results From Single-strain Studies, Enhance Reproducibility, Capture Potential Interindividual Variabilities, and Reduce False- Negatives. in Aim 1, We Will Characterize the Assay-quality of the Proposed High-content Dart Assay (with 7 Phenotypes, Including Embryonic Traits) by Testing 6 Known Toxicants With 8 Doses and in 10 Replicates Using the N2 Wild-type Strain. We Will Then Screen 33 Chemicals Including 10 False Negatives to Demonstrate the Predictability of Our Multiple Phenotype Space and Improved Sensitivity of Dart Predictions Using C. Elegans. in Aim 2, We Will Test a Subset of Chemicals Against a Panel of 12 Divergent Strains to Capture the Interindividual Variations in Toxicological Responses and Improve Interspecies Predictability. We Will Calculate Broad-sense Heritability by Measuring the Variance in Toxicology Phenotypes and Identify Genetic Contributions for Such Variances. in the Phase Ii, We Plan to Expand the Application of Our Assay to Test a Larger Library of Chemicals and Incorporate a Larger Panel of Genetically Divergent Strains to Perform QTL Analysis to Pinpoint Genes That Appear to Be Linked to Dart Effects. With the Success of This Proposal, Newormics Will Be in a Unique Position to Offer a Comprehensive Set of in Vivo Toxicology Services to Help Reduce Overall Cost and Number of Animals Required for Identifying Toxicity of New Chemicals.
Committed
$253,681
Paid out
$217.7K
86%
Committed, not yet paid
$36.0K
14%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.