Federal grant · project grant (b)
Mutational Profiling in Human Cells as an in Vitro Alternative to in Vivo Mutagenicity Assessments - Project Summary a Significant Shift in the Safety Assessment of New Drug Candidates and Environmental Chemicals That Can Revolutionize the Practice of Regulatory Toxicology Is Ongoing. This Shift Includes a Reduction, or in Some Cases Elimination, of Traditional Toxicity Testing in Animals With the Implementation of Higher-throughput Testing Schemes Using Human Cell Systems. Knowledge Regarding the Potential of New Chemicals, Food Additives, and Pharmaceuticals to Damage the Human Genome and Cause Mutations Remains Critical to Public Health. Mutations Are Heritable Changes in the Cellular Genome and Are Key Events in the Induction of Cancer, Birth Defects, and Neurological Diseases. Screening Chemicals for Their Potential to Cause Mutation in a Human Relevant Assay Offers an Effective Strategy for Improving Public Health. the Lack of a Mutagenicity Bioassay in Human Cells Is a Major Data Gap in the Genetic Toxicology Test Battery Used by Regulatory Agencies for Hazard Identification and Quantitative Risk Assessments. Our Novel Methods, Initially Developed to Identify Genetic Subclones Within Cancers, Permits Analytical Assessment of Mutagenicity and Precise Quantification of These Very Rare Events (1 in 100,000 - 1,000,000). These Methods Can Be Integrated With Human Cells as a Genetic Toxicology Assay That Can Replace 50 Yr. Old Clonal Selection Techniques to Assess Mutation. Although Duplex Sequencing Is Highly Innovative and a “game Changer”, Without Integration Into a Well-defined Human Cell-based System and Careful Validation Studies, Its Application in Regulatory Genetic Toxicology Will Be Limited. the Focus of This Sbir Phase I Application Is to Develop a New Approach Methodologies (NAM) Combining Human Cells and Duplex Sequencing as an in Vitro Alternative to in Vivo Mutation Assays. We Will Accomplish This by Conducting “proof of Principle” Experiments Using a Well-established Human Cell Line, as Outlined in Two Specific Aims. in Specific Aim 1, We Will Determine the Time Course for the Induction of Mutations at Multiple Loci Using Duplex Sequencing for a Prototypic Mutagenic Compound. in Specific Aim 2, We Will Determine the Dose Response for the Induction of Mutations at Multiple Loci Using Duplex Sequencing for Two Prototypic Mutagenic Compounds. Completion of This Phase I Sbir Will Lead to Development of a Human Cell-based Mutation Assay That Can Be Used as a Follow Up to Bacterial Mutation Assays and as a Nam to Reduce Reliance on Current in Vivo Gene Mutation Assays in Rodents. This Data Will Also Support a Phase Ii Application to Validate This Assay and Adapt These Methods to Quantify Mutation in Human CD34+ Cells and Heparg™ Cells.
Committed
-$99,572
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.