Federal grant · project grant (b)
A Digital Serious Illness Conversation Coach - Project Summary It Has Been Shown That Conversations on End-of-life Care Focused on a Patient’s Goals of Care Can Reduce Psychological Distress and Anxiety and Lead to Improved Quality of Life, and Potentially Prolonged Life, for Patients Living With Serious Illness. the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) Is a Validated and Widely Used Framework for Training the Critical Communication Skills Needed to Effectively Conduct These Conversations; However, There Currently Exists No Mechanism to Easily Support and Continue to Build These Skills in a Scalable Way. Evidence Suggests That Conversational Agents, I.e., Chatbots, Can Be Used for Training and Reinforcing Communication Skills. in This Phase I Sbir Project, We Propose to Optimize and Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Chatbot Designed to Augment Sicg Training for Healthcare Professionals (HCPS) on Initiating and Conducting Sensitive Conversations With Patients Diagnosed With Serious Illness. We Will Develop and Test a Chatbot Directly With HCPS Who Are Navigating Serious Illness Conversations And/or May Be Expected to in the Future. We Will Demonstrate Feasibility and Acceptability of an Enhanced Chatbot Prototype Through the Following Two Specific Aims: in Aim 1, We Will Create and Adapt Chatbot Content and Build an Enhanced, Fully Functional Prototype of the Chatbot With Expert Inputs. the Chatbot Will Feature 3 Different Patient Scenarios Ranging in Case Complexity. in Aim 2, We Will Conduct a Pilot Usability Study of the Prototype With 50 Target End Users—a Diverse Sample of HCPS Varying in Role, Specialty, and Career Phase Who Have Received at Least One Training Session in the Sicg. Following Enrollment, HCPS Will Independently Test the Chatbot-led Training and Complete Surveys at 3 Timepoints—baseline, Endline, and 1-MONTH After Enrollment—to Assess the Following Outcome Measures: Pre-/post-training Confidence in Having Serious Illness Conversations, Usability, and User Satisfaction. Semi-structured Endline Interviews Will Be Conducted With a Purposive Sample of 15-20 HCPS to Collect Additional Qualitative Feedback on User Experience and Recommendations for Improvement. Results of This Phase I Sbir Project Will Inform a Larger Scale Implementation Study in Potential Phase Ii Work to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Proposed Intervention to Reinforce and Augment Critical Communication Skills Essential to the Care of Seriously Ill Patients.
Committed
$274,878
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.