Federal grant · project grant (b)
Automated Mental Health Referral System - This Proposal Addresses a Significant Barrier to Obtaining Treatment for College-age Youth With Mental Disorders. Many College-age Youth With Impairing Mental Disorders Remain Untreated Because of Concerns About Stigma and Privacy, Inconvenience and Wait Times, and Because Universities Are Often Unable to Service All Such Students. Also, of Critical Importance, When Referral for Treatment Is Implemented, It Is Without Regard to the Person's Pathology, Because of the Erroneous Assumption That Treatment Need Not Be Tailored to the Individual. This Proposal Aims to Address This Critical Clinical Issue. We Advance That a Sophisticated Automated Online Referral System Would Resolve All of These Problems, But There Is No Expert-trained System for Psychiatric Referrals. We Propose to Automate the Referral Process, Designed for College-age Youth, by Bridging Online, Mental Health Assessments and Curated, Up-to-date, Mental Health Provider Networks. to This End, the Non-profit Child Mind 1NSTITUTE Is Partnering With the For-profit Miresource. Assessment Expertise Is Provided by the Child Mind Institute, Which Treats Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Disorders, Conducts Mental Health Research, Has Acquired Large Assessment Datasets, Has In-house Expertise in Mental Health Assessment, and Through Its Matter Lab Has Developed Novel Assessment Technologies Such as the Mindlogger Data Collection and Assessment Platform. Referral Infrastructure Is Provided by Miresource, a Software-as-a-service Solution Designed to Help Universities Connect Students to Local Mental Health Providers. the Matter Lab and Miresource Will Develop an Automated Online Assessment and Referral Platform That Uses Expert-trained Machine Learning to Provide Users With Personalized Referrals for Mental Health Care. Expert Referrals Will Be Based on the Six Dimensions of the Level of Care Utilization System (risk of Harm, Functional Status, Comorbidity, Environment, Treatment History, and Attitude) Applied to College Students' Responses to Mental Health Assessments. 1N Phase 1, We Will (1-1) Build Mental Health Assessments Into the Mindlogger Platform, (1-2) Build an Expert Referral Collection Interface, and (1-3) Set Up a Machine Learning Pipeline for Training and Testing an Updatable Classification Model for Automated Clinically Appropriate, Personalized Referrals. 1N Phase 11, We Will Build, Refine, and Clinically Validate Our Product for Commercialization. Specifically, We Will (11-1) Validate the Phase I Framework on a University Population, (11-2) Integrate Mindlogger's Assessments Into Miresource, and (11-3) Conduct Usability and Quality Assurance Tests of the New Mindlogger Plus Miresource Platform, to Get Feedback About Issues Related to Accessibility, Relevance, Accuracy, and Esthetics, and Incorporate Solutions in Response to This Feedback Into a Final Version.
Committed
$1.1 Million
Paid out
$1.0M
89%
Committed, not yet paid
$129.2K
11%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.