Federal grant
Award Purpose: the Falls Irrigation District in Power County, Idaho Will Install Two Automated Gates on the East Canal to Improve Water Measurement and Management. This Project Will Increase Operational Efficiency, Reduce Manual Labor, and Minimize Water Loss. Additionally, the Project Supports Existing Planning Efforts Such as the Henrys Fork Basin Study That Highlights the Importance of Sustainable Water Management and Adaptive Strategies in Response to Regional Drought.activities to Be Performed Include: Conduct Site Preparation and Concrete Workinstall Two Gates at the East Canal Headworksintegrate Gates With Existing Scada Systemtrain Staff on Gate Operation and Data Managementcommission and Test the Systemexpected Deliverables or Outcomes: the Recipient Will Automate a Key Check Structure on Its East Canal by Installing Two Automated Gates to Improve Water Delivery Efficiency, Reduce Spills, and Enhance Operational Control. Intended Beneficiaries: the Fall Irrigation District Automation Project Achieves the Public Purpose of the Act by Conserving Water and Improving Water Management.subrecipient Activities (if Known or Specified at Time of Award): Na
Committed
$75,145
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…