Federal grant · project grant (b)
The Walker Basin Conservancy, in Partnership With Other Stakeholders, Will Build on Existing Relationships to Formally Establish a Walker River Basin Watershed Group. the Goals of the Group Are to Identify Landscape-scale Watershed Priorities and Plan Actions to Address Them Using a Comprehensive Approach That Focuses on Stakeholder Engagement and Finding Multi-benefit Solutions That Balance Ecological and Community Needs. the Group Will Meet These Goals by: 1. Engaging Diverse Stakeholders That Affect and Are Affected by Water Resources in the Basin, 2. Establishing Group Mission Vision, Bylaws, and Organizational Structure, 3. Compiling Data Characterizing the Watershed and Identifying Any Data Gaps, 4. Synthesizing Information From Existing Management Plans and Feedback From Diverse Stakeholders to Identify Shared Management Priorities Across the Watershed, and 5. Producing an Integrated Watershed Management Plan That Identifies Critical Watershed Needs and Clear Actions for Addressing Them. the Walker Basin Covers Nearly 4,000 Square Miles From the Headwaters in the Sierra Nevada in California to Walker Lake in Nevada and Supports Important Ecosystems, Agricultural and Tribal Communities, and Recreation Opportunities. the Area Also Provides Critical Habitat for a Variety of Special Status Wildlife. However, the Walker Basin Faces Significant Challenges, Including Over-appropriation of Water Resources, the Ecological Collapse of Walker Lake Due to Water Diversions, Unsustainable Groundwater Withdrawal, Impaired Water Quality, and the Associated Strain on Ecosystems and Wildlife Which Is Exacerbated by Climate Change and Wildfires.many Critical Issues in the Walker River Basin Operate at the Landscape Scale, Are Complex, Have No Easy Solution, and Require Investment and Coordination Among a Diverse Group of Stakeholders That Have Different and Sometimes Conflicting Priorities. a Central Goal of Forming a Watershed Group Is Bringing Together Diverse Stakeholders to Share Information About Priorities Issues in the Watershed and Work Towards Solutions That Balance Multiple Needs and Objectives.
Committed
$299,918
Paid out
$119.8K
40%
Committed, not yet paid
$180.1K
60%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.