Federal grant · project grant (b)
Hvpud Intends to Assess, Upgrade, and Repair Irrigation Systems to Improve Water Efficiency for Recreational, Agricultural, and Community Uses. Funding Will Allow Hvpud to Improve Water Sustainability by Hiring Engineers to Update Existing Infrastructure, Design Improved Irrigation Infrastructure, and Install Meters on Intake Systems to Assess Water Consumption From Tributaries in the Region. the Tribe Will Assess Existing Irrigation Systems, Hire Contractors to Provide Recommendations and Engineering Design to Upgrade Existing and Create New Irrigation Infrastructure, Complete Engineering Design and Cost Estimates to Construct and Expand Irrigation Systems That Pump Directly From the Trinity River Into Currently Non-irrigated Land, and Install Flow Measurement Devices on Intake Systems to Assess Water Consumption From Area Tributaries.at the Completion of the Project the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation Will Have Efficient Irrigation Systems in Place for Recreational, Agricultural, and Community Uses That Allow for Fish Passage While Improving the Sustainability of Future Water Supplies
Committed
$535,270
Paid out
$303.2K
57%
Committed, not yet paid
$232.0K
43%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…