Federal grant · project grant (b)
The Tulare Irrigation District in Tulare California Will Develop an Advanced Online Geographic Information System Data Management, Modeling, and Forecasting Tool That Will Elevate the Efficiency of Surface Water and Groundwater Operations, Fostering Improved Water Resource Management. in Recent Years, the District Has Seen Vast Reductions in Surface Water That Has Led to Increased Usage of Groundwater Supplies, Which Has Put This Region Under Social and Economic Stress. by Gathering and Utilizing the Needed Data to Establish Decision Support Tools Through the Development of a New Data Management System, the District Will Be Better Equipped to Make Forecasts and Water Management Decisions in Real-time to Support the Ongoing Need to Manage Surface Water and Groundwater Collaboratively to Meet the Regions Water Demands. This Project Is Supported by Groundwater Sustainability Agencies, a Water Conservation District, a Water Authority, the Cities of Tulare and Visalia, Various Irrigation Districts, and a Ditch Company.
Committed
$260,000
Paid out
$18.8K
7%
Committed, not yet paid
$241.2K
93%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…