Federal grant · project grant (b)
Purpose: to Provide a Conceptual Design and Cost Opinion for a Drinking Water Treatment Plant and Associated Potable Water Delivery Infrastructure, While Also Continuing to Provide Technical Input Regarding the Water Delivery and Water Management Aspects of the Proposed Settlement Terms (with the U.s. Government).activities to Be Performed: Prepare a Conceptual Design and Cost Opinion for a Drinking Water Plant and Associated Delivery Infrastructure on the Recipients Reservation Andprovide Technical Information to the Recipient to Ensure That the Water Sources the Recipient Would Agree to in Settlement (with the U.s. Government) Will Provide the Recipient With Secure and Reliable Water to Meet the Needs of the (recipients) Reservation as a Permanent Tribal Homeland.expected Deliverables or Outcomes: the Recipient Will Provide a Conceptual Design and Cost Opinion for a Drinking Water Plant and Associated Delivery Infrastructure on the Recipients Reservationintended Beneficiaries: the United States Public and the Recipient Are the Intended Beneficiaries. Subrecipient Activities: the Recipient Will Contract With
Committed
$300,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…