Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Reverse Osmosis Based Water Reuse Produces a High Quality Purified Water, But There Is Room for Significant Improvement to Optimize Energy and Cost Influent Water Quality Can Be Dynamic and Requires Multiple Treatment Barriers for Chemical and Pathogen Removal in This Work, Faults Detected Will Include Abnormal Water Quality, Equipment Failure, and Atypical Fouling Rate Fault Detection Methods Will Include Supervised Machine Learning and Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing Process Control Will Include Model Predictive Control and Multiblock Principal Component Analysis Desktop Evaluations of Cutting Edge Methodologies in Year One Will Precede Cloud or Edge Based, Semi Autonomous, Near Real Time Implementation at Demonstration Scale in Year Two
Committed
$641,900
Paid out
$562.7K
88%
Committed, not yet paid
$79.2K
12%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…