Federal grant · cooperative agreement
1. Purpose: This Project Will Provide Guidance to District Personnel and Promote the Efficient Delivery of Agricultural Water, Especially Under Problem SITUATIONS.2. Activities to Be Performed Include Providing Direct Assistance to Individual Districts for Water Efficiency Issues; Providing Indirect Assistance of Researching Issues That Span Multiple Districts; Educating on Water Management Subjects; and Communicating Expertise Through Various Professional FORUMS.3. Deliverables and Expected Outcomes: the Objective of This Project Is to Provide Technical Assistance and Guidance to Relieve Strain on the Agricultural Side of Water Balance and Ensure Water Is Made Available for Competing Uses Among the Public and the Environment. the Recipient Will Provide Guidance for Delivery System Modernization and Water Manager and Conservation, as Well as Classroom and Hands-on Training for Efficient Delivery System Design, Management, Operational Practices, and Flow Measurement and MANAGEMENT.4. Intended Beneficiary(ies): the Public and the Environment
Committed
$6.3 Million
Paid out
$3.5M
55%
Committed, not yet paid
$2.9M
45%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…