Federal grant · project grant (b)
Developing Interoperable Tools for Anxiety and Depression Screening - Project Summary Anxiety and Depression Are Prevalent in Neurological Disorders and Other Chronic Conditions Requiring Specialty Care, and These Comorbidities Are Often Under-recognized and Undertreated, Despite Greater Impact on Outcomes Than the Primary Chronic Condition. Clinician Time-related Barriers to Screening Contribute to Undertreatment. Epilepsy Is a Key Example, With Well-documented Undertreatment of Anxiety and Depression Despite High Prevalence and Impact, and Data Indicating That Patients Prioritize Treatment and Prefer to Be Treated in a Neurology Clinic for Depression and Anxiety. Tools and Strategies Are Needed to Reduce Burden of Anxiety and Depression Screening in Neurology Clinics and Other Subspecialty Settings, to Close Care Gaps and Facilitate Multicenter Implementation and Effectiveness Studies of Evidence-based Interventions Such as Collaborative Care Models That Involve Repeated Symptom Monitoring With Anxiety and Depression Instruments. Our Group Successfully Implemented Screening in a Tertiary Epilepsy Center Using Electronic Health Record (ehr)-based Tools Enabling Patient Self-completion of Instruments After Brief Nursing Staff Activation. This More Than Quadrupled Screening, But a Substantial Gap Remained Due to the Nursing Activation Step, and Barriers to Scaling Included Lack of Ehr/research Database Integration and Need for Custom Ehr Build at Each Potential Site for Future Multicenter Studies. Interoperable Tools Facilitating Independent Patient Self-completion Are Needed to Support Multicenter Intervention Trials With Symptom Monitoring and Scale Implementation Strategies. Thus, in This Proposal We Aim to Develop and Refine Interoperable Tools for Anxiety and Depression Screening. Specifically, in Aim 1 We Will Evaluate Screening Completion (primary) and Process Measures Comparing Interoperable, Redcap-based Methods to Ehr Patient Portal-based Methods for Delivering Validated Anxiety and Depression Instruments to Epilepsy Patients. This Will Be Accomplished in a Randomized Study With N=220 Individuals Per Arm Comparing 4 Delivery Modalties (twilio Text VS. Redcap Survey VS. Ehr Portal Questionnaires With Reminder VS. Standard Ehr Portal Questionnaires). in Aim 2, We Will Evaluate and Implement a Reproducible Approach to Ehr and Research System Integration of Epic Ehr Flowsheet Data With Redcap via Kit Flowsheets Application Programming Interface (api). We Will Also Develop and Disseminate a Governance Process to Accomplish Bidirectional Integration for Ehr Flowsheet Data With Redcap via Epic’s Addflowsheetvalue Api. This R03 Project Will Be Instrumental to Support Next-step Larger Scale Grant Applications for the Principal Investigator Examining Collaborative Care Model Effectiveness in Neurology Settings and Screening Implementation. the Proposal Is Relevant Across Chronic Conditions Treated by Subspecialists and Highly Translational, Overcoming Key Roadblocks to Translation in Clinical Implementation Research Involving the Ehr.
Committed
$155,000
Paid out
$147.4K
95%
Committed, not yet paid
$7.6K
5%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.