Federal grant · project grant (b)
Evaluating the Mechanical Stability of 3D Printed Materials to Inform Collections Care Decision Making for Preservation and Access [this Research Aims to Evaluate the Mechanical Stability of 3D Printed Materials Used in Preservation and Access Activities. Digital Scanning and Printing Technologies Are Finding Increased Use by Cultural Institutions as They Offer New Opportunities to Reduce the Risk of Damage to Objects During Treatment and Exhibition Preparation by Enabling Custom-tailored Solutions in Minimally Invasive Ways. While 3D Printing Offers Improved Efficiencies and Outcomes for Certain Applications, the Mechanical and Chemical Stability of Printed Materials Used in These Contexts Remains Understudied. This Project Will Assess Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Materials Exposed to Changing Environments and as They Apply to Three Major Areas of Use in Preservation and Access, Namely I) Dimensional Change of 3D Printed Materials Used for Object Infills, Ii) Creep Behavior of 3D Printed Mounts, and Iii) Damping Properties of 3D Printed Materials in Response to Dynamic Loads.]
Committed
$315,854
Paid out
$42.0K
13%
Committed, not yet paid
$273.9K
87%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…