Federal grant · project grant (b)
In the Interest of Fine Art: a Shelburne Museum Planning Project [shelburne Museum Requests a Sustaining Cultural Heritage Collections Planning Grant From the National Endowment for the Humanities to Evaluate Deteriorating Environmental Conditions in Two Museum Buildings That House Fine Arts Collections and Develop Plans to Implement Improvements to the Buildings? Infrastructures Considering Climate Change. in Recent Years, the Museum Has Seen Deviations in Temperature and Humidity Conditions Within Both Structures, Risking Damage to the Collections and Coinciding With Climate Change in the Region. Although Both Buildings Are Equipped With Hvac Systems, the Systems Are Near the End of Life and Are Having Difficulty Maintaining Desired Environmental Conditions. If Awarded This Grant, the Museum Will Embark on a Two-year Project to Assess Energy-monitoring Systems in Both Structures, Create Schematic Plans for Improving the Buildings' Envelopes and Systems to Help Maintain Desired Conditions, and Select an Option to Pursue in the Project's Next Phase.]
Committed
$48,634
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…