Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Programming Supports a Comprehensive Network of Cooperative Study Units to Facilitate Cooperative Research, Technical Assistance, Education, and Training to Inform Science-based Management of the National Park System. the Study Units Facilitate Multi-disciplinary Science and Integrated Information Products Across Multiple Geographic Regions of the National Park System. This Project Will Conduct Landscape-scale Conversion of Agricultural Sites and Other Open Lands to Native Grasslands, Where Feasible, and Restore or Enhance Existing High-quality to Degraded Remnants in Select Sites Across the Northeast Region. It Will Develop and Implement Processes to Apply Standard Approaches to Assess and Evaluate Sites for Necessary Site Preparations, Site Enhancements or Rehabilitations and Conversions. the Project Will Re-evaluate Effectiveness of These Processes Each Year. Beneficiaries Include State and Local Governments, Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments, Public Private Nonprofit Organizations, Nonprofit Institutions of Higher Education, and the General Public).
Committed
$1.3 Million
Paid out
$5.4K
<1%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.2M
100%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…