Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Programming Supports a Comprehensive Network of Cooperative Study Units to Facilitatecooperative Research, Technical Assistance, Education, and Training to Inform Science-based Management Ofthe National Park System. the Study Units Facilitate Multi-disciplinary Science and Integrated Informationproducts Across Multiple Geographic Regions of the National Park System. Through This Agreement We Intend to Conduct an Internal Protocol Update Revision With Focus on Sampling Design for Grassland Systems. We Will Utilize All Existing Grasslands Data to Guide Sample Design Questions and Collaboratively Perform Data Summarizations and Analysis for Use in Scientific Reports and Other Science Communication Products. Beneficiaries Include State and Local Governments, Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments, Public Private Nonprofit Organizations, Nonprofit Institutions of Higher Education, and the General Public).
Committed
$459,832
Paid out
$311.8K
68%
Committed, not yet paid
$148.0K
32%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…