Federal award · direct payment for specified use, as a subsidy or other non-reimbursable direct financial aid (c)
Community-led Structural Intervention to Address Health Consequences of Community-police Interactions - Policing and Incarceration Are Root Causes of Health Inequity, But to Date, There Have Been Few Efforts to Assess How Law Enforcement Practices and the Carceral System Are Structural Factors That May Shape Poor Health. Addressing This Gap, We Propose a Community-led Structural Intervention to Address Health Consequences of Community-police Interactions Aimed at Reducing Discretionary Arrests and Incarceration Tarrant County, Texas. This Study Seeks to Address the Impacts of Policing and Incarceration on Tarrant County’s Disproportionately Impacted Communities. the Structural Factors of the Criminal Justice System, Related Policy, and the Role of Police Actions in Exacerbating Mental and Physical Health Outcomes Will Be Investigated Throughout the Course of the Funding Process. Our Study Will Bring Together a Coalition of Stakeholders Affected by Policing, Including Black, Latine/latinx, and Lgbtq+ Communities, to Identify Commonalities and Particularities of Policing Among Each Community. Using the Precede-proceed Model of Intervention Planning, We Propose a Multi-phase Process for Identifying Changeable Priorities Related to Policing. We Expect the Specific Health Outcomes That Will Be Assessed Include Use of Force and Poor Mental Health Days. Further, This Study Will Bring Together a Diverse Group of Community Members Through a Community Advisory Board, Thereby Engaging Community Members That Have Lived Experiences With Mass Incarceration and Policing in Order to Improve the Population Health Within the Community. Upon Successful Completion of This Work, We Expect to Have Developed, Implemented, and Evaluated a Pilot Intervention That Addresses Community-police Interactions and Incarceration as a Structural Determinant of Health That Has Individual, Interpersonal, and Community Consequences.
Committed
$3.3 Million
Paid out
$1.7M
52%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.6M
48%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…