Federal grant
General Justification: the General Justification for This Grant Is to Further Support a Mission Concept Effort (phase a) Initiated Under SIMPLEX-2015 Risk Reduction Funding But Augmented by MSSS Ir&d to Demonstrate to a Mission Concept Review Level That the Mars Micro Orbiter Mission Is a Selectable Nasa Mission as a Modified Class D+ Design and Build to Low Cost High Science Return Mission and Executable Within the Timeframe of a 2020 Launch Opportunity. a Specific Justification Is to Further Assess and Study With Launch Vehicle Organizations Ways to Accommodate the Mmo Spacecraft While Reducing Risk for Mission Development. Completing This Augmentation Work Will Lead to the Mission Concept Review in Item H. of the Sow (see Above). H. Conduct a Mission Concept Review at the End of This Initial Work Phase at Which Will Be Reported in the Presentation Package the: I. Architecture&system Concept Ii. Mission Concept Iii. Institutional Capabilities Iv. V&V Draft for Risk Reduction V. Systems Engineering Management Approach Vi. Draft Configuration Management Approach.
Committed
$391,766
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…