Federal grant · formula grant (a)
Auburn University (AU) Is an 1862 Land-grant Institution That Serves the Citizens of Alabama Through Instruction, Research, and Extension Programs. the Smith-lever Award Provides Critical Capacity Funding, Along With Cooperative State and County Funding, to Fulfill the Extension Mission of Au. the Alabama Cooperative Extension System (ACES) Is a Partnership Between Au and Alabama A<(>&<)>m University, an 1890 Land-grant Institution. Aces Provides a Platform for 1862 and 1890 Institutional Strengths to Address Relevant Issues That Affect the Interdependence of Urban, Suburban, Exurban, and Rural Clientele. Aces Employs a Highly Collaborative Program Development and Delivery Process That Allows for the Integrative and Collaborative Application to Serve and Meet the Needs of Alabamians in All 67 Counties Within the State. Agents From the Two Institutions Are Jointly Located in County Extension Offices and Function as County Extension Teams. Aces Cooperates With Tuskegee University Cooperative Extension, and Agents Are Co-located in 12 Counties. Aces Conducts Extensive Needs Assessments Through an Internal and External Approach to Identify Contemporary and Emerging Issues. a Qualitative Internal Stakeholder Survey Was Conducted to Identify Strengths, Program Needs, and Emerging Issues, With Priority PR Ogram Teams Refining the Findings. Insights Informed Updates to the External Stakeholder Survey, Which Was Broadly Distributed by Extension Personnel and Partners; Results Were Synthesized and Shared at Multiple Scales to Guide 2026 Program Planning. Aces Seeks to Address Selected Questions That Lead to the Identification of Critical Issues of Strategic Importance. These Issues Include But Are Not Limited to 1. Enhancing the Sustainability, Competitiveness, and Profitability of U.s. Food and Agricultural Systems, While Safeguarding Against Biosecurity Threats. 2. Ensuring a Safe, Secure, and Abundant Food Supply Through Global Leadership in Agricultural Innovation and Supply Chain Resilience. 3. Promoting Environmental Stewardship by Developing Sustainable Practices for Managing Food, Water, and Land Resources, and Mitigating the Effects of Extreme Weather on Agricultural Systems. 4. Improving Human Health and Nutrition Through Science-based Education and Outreach. 5. Fostering Rural Prosperity and Resilience, With a Focus on Economic Development, Health, and Infrastructure in Communities. 6. Building Individual and Family Capacity Through Lifelong Learning and Community Engagement. 7. Advancing Energy Security and the Bioeconomy Through the Development of Novel Energy Resources and Sustainable Land Use Practices. These Statewide Issues Are Integrated Into Coordinated Initiatives Outlined in an Annual Plan-of-work. Additionally, the Land-grant Universities of Alabama Engage Partner Organizations and 1862 <(>&<)>1890 Universities in Neighboring States to Capitalize Upon Combined Strengths and Optimize Impacts. Our Programs Are Planned to Be Aligned With Usda's National Institute of Food and Agriculture Research and Extension Priority Areas and With Alabama Needs as Identified by Stakeholders. as a Result of the Alignment, the Focus Will Be on the Following Critical ISSUES:1.GLOBAL Food Security and HUNGER;2.NATURAL Resource and Environmental SUSTAINABILITY;3.FOOD System and Food SAFETY;4.HUMAN Nutrition, Well-being, Health, and OBESITY;5.EXPLORING Novel Energy SYSTEMS;6.COMMUNITY Development; and 7.FAMILY, Home, and 4-H and Youth Development. All Planned Programs Contained in the Alabama Integrated Extension and Research FY2024-2028 Plan of Work Are Developed Within the Context of Research and Community Engagement and Are of Relevance to All Residents of Alabama Who May Benefit From the Local Knowledge Base or Service. All Programs Are Logic Model-based and Include Clearly Defined Expectations Regarding Program Outcomes and Impacts. as Such, All Programs Are Inherently Capable of Producing Measures of Extension Productivity.
Committed
$7.5 Million
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.