Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
2. Project Summary Oysters Are Economically Important, But Their Natural Populations Have Drastically Declined, and Oyster Aquaculture Is Necessary to Meet Market Demand. Off-bottom Oyster Farming, Where Oysters Are Grown Suspended Above the Sediment, Is on the Rise in Alabama Because It Reduces Losses Related to Poor Water Quality and Predation. However, There Is Considerable Upfront Investment Both in Permitting Time and Startup Costs to Create an Oyster Farm. Appropriate Site Selection and Use of the Correct Aquaculture Practices Are Paramount to Maximize Oyster Survival and Growth to Increase Yield. Using a Combination of In-situ Research and Machine Learning, We Will Create a Model to Ascertain the Best Locations for Oyster Farming. Data Needed for This Model Includes Oyster Growth and Survival, Oyster Feeding Efficiency, and Water Quality Data Such as Temperature, Salinity, and Chlorophyll a (as a Measure of Food Availability for Oysters). We Will Collect These Data for the Model in a Variety of Ways. Citizen Scientists in the Oyster Gardening Program Will Raise Oysters and Provide Oyster Growth and Water Quality (salinity, Temperature) Data in Conjunction With Our Team. Oyster Feeding Efficiency Will Be Assessed by Our Team Using an In-situ Filter Feeding Technique at Multiple Sites Along the Coast. These Data Will Be Used to Develop a Machine Learning Tool That Will Create a Model to Predict Oyster Growth and Survival. the Goal Is to Create a Tool Whereby Water Quality and Other Parameters Can Be Entered Into an Online Form, and Ai Will Rank Site Suitability for Oyster Farming. Having a Tool That Will Allow Short Term Data to Be Used to Assess Site Suitability for Oyster Aquaculture Will Benefit Industry Partners as Well as State Agencies to Inform Permitting and Nonprofit Organizations That Seek to Restore Oyster Populations.
Committed
$483,642
Paid out
$60.2K
12%
Committed, not yet paid
$423.4K
88%
Loading…
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then unspent ceiling.