Federal grant · project grant (b)
Purpose: This Project Seeks to Implement the Connecticut Kelp Innovation Center, Which Will Address Critical Barriers That Hamper Growth of Seaweed Cultivation in Connecticut, Creating Working Waterfront Jobs That Have a Climate Positive Impact. Activities to Be Performed: the Center Will Address These Barriers by Increasing Local Farmer-operated Kelp Seed Production Capacity, Helping Farmers Scale Operations, Developing a Shared-use Mobile Platform for Harvest, Primary Processing, and Stabilization, and Expanding Cold Storage Capacity. Expected Outcomes: as a Result of This Project, It Is Anticipated That Annual Kelp Seed Production Capacity in Connecticut Will Triple to 225,000 Feet Which Can Yield Up to 1.8 Million Pounds of Wet Harvest, by 2027, 7 Connecticut Kelp Farmers Will Increase Production by 300,000 - 500,000 LBS and 3 Shellfish Farmers Will Diversify Operations to Include Kelp; and Connecticut Farmers Will Expand Production, Reduce Costs, and Capture More of the Kel
Committed
$2.4 Million
Paid out
$1.6M
66%
Committed, not yet paid
$821.6K
34%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…