Federal grant · project grant (b)
There Is a Lack of Publicly Available Data That Describes Climate Adaptive Capacity in Rural Communities in the United States Few Studies Have Been Conducted and None With a National Scope. This Scientific Gap Creates Additional Challenges for Rural Communities Attempting to Demonstrate Their Fiscal Need for Resources to Funding Agencies. Concurrently, Agencies Lack Data to Make More Equitable Fiscal Decisions. the Goal of This Study Is to Develop a Validated Rural Climate-adaptive-capacity Index for the Entire United States and Display the Results in an Online Mapping Tool While Also Contributing Insights to the Academic Literature. This Research Project Will Use a Mixed-methods Approach to Calibrate and Validate an Index of Climate Adaptive Capacity for Rural Communities, Noting That Social Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity Are Not Synonymous. Methods Will Be Applied to Improve and Expand a Previous Study That Identified Factors Thought to Represent and Impact Loca
Committed
$149,924
Paid out
$94.7K
63%
Committed, not yet paid
$55.2K
37%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…