Federal grant · project grant (b)
Expansion of Aquaculture Production Depends Crucially on the Development of Technologies That Are Able to Add Uncrewed Management Capabilities to Fish Farming Operations, I.e., the Ability to Control the Tank's Population Remotely and Without Human Presence. the Present Project Aims to Expand Our Successful Phase I Feasibility Research Toward Commercializing an Autonomous Device That Can Be Inserted Into Established Aquaculture Workflows. the Result Will Be a Flexible, and Adaptable, Automated System That Permits the Sorting and Handling of Fish Based on Selected Phenotypic Characteristics of Interest, Including Growth Rates/condition, Health Status, Skin Abnormalities, Parasitic Load, Morphological Features, or Behavior. This System Will Enhance Productivity by Reducing Stress and Injury From Human Handling, and Increase the Quality and Quantity of the Product Raised in Intensive Cultivation. Results of Our Phase I Feasibility Confirm That the Time for Autonomous Methods, Uncrewed Dev
Committed
$500,000
Paid out
$253.7K
51%
Committed, not yet paid
$246.3K
49%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…