Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The Goal of This Project Is to Demonstrate That Ropeless Fishing Can Be Conducted at a Scale That Is Commensurate With Typical Fishing Operations While Providing Risk Reduction for Marine Mammal Entanglement and an Alternative to Time-area Closures. the Work Will Comprise Four Tasks Including (1) Establishing a Pathway for Large-scale Utilization and Implementation of Ropeless Fishing for Dungeness Crab Fishers in California; (2) Providing the Necessary Outreach, Equipment, Training and At-sea Trials to Develop and Verify the Required Level of Ropeless Fishing Expertise for Key Early Adopters; (3) Demonstrating and Documenting That Ropeless Fishing Can Be Successfully Scaled to a Level That Is Representative of Large-scale Adoption for Participating Fishers, and (4) Using the Results to Identify Further Technology Improvements, Define Remaining Barriers to Implementation, Educate the Fishing Community on the Outcomes, and Recommend a Path Forward for Ropeless Fishing That Can Be Suppor
Committed
$199,584
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…