Beta© 2026 Adaptrex, LLC
Beta© 2026 Adaptrex, LLC
Federal grant · project grant (b)
Supreme Justice: Student Controversies, Debates & Decisions: a Game for Civics and History Classrooms [icivics Proposes a New Civics and History Education Gaming Experience, Earmarked for Young People Ages 12-18. This Project Is a Unique in Its Approach to Teaching Critical Humanities Skills. Icivics Will Partner With Gigantic Mechanic to Design, Create, and Disseminate Supreme Justice ? an Interactive Classroom Experience Meant to Promote Civil Dialogue, Civic and Historical Knowledge ... and Engage Students. Supreme Justice Is a Multi-media Experience. It Builds on Best Practices in Critical Humanities Education. Students Will Engage in a Multi-player Live Simulation; the Technology Combines Video, Individualized Student Profiles, and Real-time Voting. Players Will Explore Different Aspects of Government and Civic Life as Well as Concepts of Student Controversies, Like First Amendment Rights. Our Gaming Experience Will Equip Players With Facts and Primary Sources, Guiding Them Towards Face-to-face Discussions Where They Can Work Together to Craft Arguments and Debate Key Issues.]
Committed
$400,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…