Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Providing Training Relating to the Purpose of This Program, Eligible Activities, and Program Performance Goals. Requiring Recipients to Participate in a Pre-implementation Conference With Mbda to Review the Proposed Technical Assistance, Services, and Performance Goals That the Recipient Will Provide and Measure. Providing Necessary Guidance and Facilitating Collaborations With Other Mbda Programs and Initiatives, Jurisdictions Receiving Ssbci Funds From the U.s. Department of Treasury, and Federal Agencies Other Than Mbda, as Appropriate. Monitoring Activities Carried Out by the Awardee, Including by Soliciting Feedback From Enrolled Sedi Businesses. Conducting Periodic Program Evaluation and Providing Findings for Improvement. Establishing and Enforcing Administrative, Communications, and Reporting Requirements for Each Awardee. Providing Access to and Training for a Performance Management Reporting System
Committed
$3.0 Million
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…