Federal grant · project grant (b)
The Pacific Science Center Will Develop New Evaluation Tools to Assess the Impact of Tinker Tank, a Visitor-directed, Hands-on Design Space in Which Participants Are Challenged to Use Their Creativity, Problem Solving, and Experience to Understand the Processes of Design, Engineering, and Science. the Project Will Allow the Museum to Determine Which Tools, Adapted From Both Informal Learning Settings (such as Timing and Tracking Studies, Observations, Surveys, and Focus Groups) and Formal Settings (such as Design Journals, Digital Portfolios, and Badging),are Most Suitable for Providing Meaningful Data About the Learning and Engagement Occurring in Its Makerspace. by Adjusting and Refining the Evaluation Tools and Methods, the Museum Will Be Able to Measure Learning in Its Makerspace, Determine the Extent to Which It Is Achieving the Goals and Objectives of Its Tinker Tank, and Guide Planning for Expansion of Making Activities Into Different Areas of Its Exhibition Floor.
Committed
$84,338
Paid out
$60.1K
71%
Committed, not yet paid
$24.2K
29%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…