Federal grant · project grant (b)
The Digital Library Federation Assessment Interest Group Will Create the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (d-craft), Which Will Contain Resources, Recommended Practices, and Use Cases for Sustainably Measuring and Evaluating the Reuse of Digital Assets Held by Cultural Heritage Knowledge Organizations. the Creation of D-craft Will Allow Cultural Heritage and Knowledge Organizations to Better Understand the Ways Users Engage With, Reuse, and Transform Digital Content. It Will Standardize Approaches and Recommended Practices for Assessing and Communicating the Economic, Educational, Scholarly, Scientific, Social, and Cultural Value and Impact of Digital Collections. Ultimately, D-craft Will Support the Use of Evidence-based Approaches to Build and Improve on Inclusive, User-centered Platforms, Systems, and Collections.
Committed
$249,748
Paid out
$248.7K
100%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.1K
<1%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…