Federal grant · project grant (b)
Ithaka S+R Will Examine the National Landscape of Legal Information Access for People Who Are Incarcerated, as Well as the Current State of Law Librarianship in Facilitating Law Access for the Justice-impacted Population. the Grant Will Investigate What Service Models Departments of Corrections Use to Comply With Their Statutory Obligation to Provide Access to Legal Information to Incarcerated Persons; How These Models Compare, and Which Are Most Effective; How Law Librarians Facilitate Access to the Law for System-impacted Individuals and Communities; and What Training and Resources Are Needed to Support Law Librarians in Providing Effective and Equitable Services. the Project Seeks to Improve Access to the Law and Legal Information Among People Who Are Incarcerated, as Well as Communities Impacted by the Legal System. the Project Will Result in Information on Best Practices and Outcomes Regarding: 1) Structural Models for Accessing and Using Legal Information and Resources; and 2) Coordinating Services and Training to Maximize Equity in Access and Use.
Committed
$303,386
Paid out
$278.4K
92%
Committed, not yet paid
$25.0K
8%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…