Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Enlc Proposes to Work in Cooperation With the Elko BLM District, in Their Mission to Detect, Prevent, Control, and or Eradicate Invasive and Noxious Weed Populations by: 1.ASSISTING With Inventorying and Documenting Locations of Noxious Weeds and Other Invasive SPECIES.2.USING an Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPM) Approach to Determine the Most Effective Method of Weed CONTROL.3.ASSISTING With Selection and Application of the Most Effective and Targeted Control Method. 4.ASSISTING With Monitoring and Evaluation of Weed Control TREATMENTS.5.ASSISTING With the Prioritization and Treatment of Target Undesirable Plant Species on the Elko DISTRICT.6.ASSISTING With Educational Outreach and Public Engagement.
Committed
$1.6 Million
Paid out
$1.0M
68%
Committed, not yet paid
$501.3K
32%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…