Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The Goal of This Project Is to Actively Maintain a Watershed Wide Stakeholder Partnership Aimed at the Assessment, Improvement, Restoration, and Protection of the Upper Arkansas Watershed for Present and Future Generations We Are Committed to Long Term Strategies, Novel Restoration Approaches, and Ongoing Land Management to Improve the Health and Function of This Watershed We Work With Local Experts to Perform Site Specific Watershed Health Assessments These Assessments Identify Key Riparian Conservation and Restoration Opportunities Our Focus on Riparian Restoration Increases the Ability of Our Streams to Filter Upland Erosion Improving Water Quality Along With Holistic Range Management, and Selective Spot Treatment of Upland Erosion Control We Are Working to Improve This Watershed S Health Through Demonstration Projects Highlighting Best Practices in Holistic Range Management, Erosion Control, and Riparian Restoration We Will Showcase Effective Land Stewardship Practices That Will Serve as a Model for the Watershed
Committed
$68,000
Paid out
$38.7K
57%
Committed, not yet paid
$29.3K
43%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…