Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)

Salcha-Delta SWCD

Initial Assessment and Base Mapping of Wade and Nome Creek Areas Would Be Completed Assessments Would Use Aim Methods to Evaluate Current Conditions and the Root Causes of Impaired Stream and Floodplain Functions the Availability of Restoration Resources on Site or in Close Proximity to the Project Areas Would Also Be Completed the Collected Assessment and Survey Data Would Be Used to Develop Restoration Designs for Sections of Wade and Nome Creeks Implementation of the Designs Would Be Contingent Upon the Level of Funding Available

Committed

$6.2 Million

Paid out
$5.8M
94%
Committed, not yet paid
$360.3K
6%

How to read these numbers

One award, start to finish: Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed vs. ceiling: Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
Paid out: The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
The ledger: Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
The money bar: One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .

Source

This award on USAspending.gov ↗