Federal grant · project grant (b)
Application Purpose: Funding Is to Replace Antiquated Paper Driven Processes and Upgrade to a Software and Database Driven Platform to Improve Reporting Training Purchasing and Safety Efficiencies. the New Technologies Include Scheduling Software for Driver Rostering Procurement Electronic Requisition Software Driver Training Hardware and Software and SMS Safety Reporting Software. ; Activities Performed: Purchase Installation Training and Implementation of Bus Simulators Procurement Software Electronic Requisition Software Scheduling Software and SMS Safety Reporting Software; Expected Outcomes: the Requested Information Technology Items Would Replace Some Existing Heavily Paper Driven Related Tasks With More Efficient and Eco-friendly Processes.; Intended Beneficiaries: Clark Crawford Cumberland Edgar Edwards Effingham Gallatin Hamilton Hardin Jasper Lawrence Pope Richland Saline Wabash Wayne White and Williamson Counties.; Subrecipient Activities: N/a
Committed
$1.2 Million
Paid out
$127.4K
11%
Committed, not yet paid
$1.1M
89%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…