Federal grant · project grant (b)
Refinement and Scaling of the Digital Archive of Indigenous Language Persistence Translation Interface (dailp Ti) [the Digital Archive of Indigenous Language Persistence (DAILP) Seeks Level Iii Funding to Transform the Dailp Translation Interface (dailp Ti) Prototype Into a Shareable Resource for Indigenous Document Translation. the Prototype Already Draws on Dailp Lexical Datasets and Resources to Produce Digital Edited Collections of Translated and Annotated Indigenous Language Documents. We Now Move to a Finalized, Sustainable Application That Can Be Installed and Used by Partner Projects, and We Establish a Community of Support for the Code in the Long Term. We Will Implement Enhancements Based on Feedback From Cherokee Community Members, Develop Training Materials and Documentation, Conduct a Code Sustainability and Data Management Review, and Test the Dailp Ti With Two Test-case Teams. by the End of the Grant, We Will Be Ready to Disseminate the Dailp Ti Code to a Wider Community of Projects, and Empower Those Projects to Support and Contribute to the Development of Dailp.]
Committed
$350,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…