Federal grant · project grant (b)
Investigating the Effect of Material Versus Digital-born Features in Automatic Handwriting Detection for Early Printed Books [many Past Digital Humanities Computer Vision Projects Focus on Digitization and Data Collection. Using Library-scale Digital Collections, We Propose a Digital Humanities Advancement Grant (level Ii) to Move Beyond Digitization and Develop Object Detection Models for Localizing Handwriting Across Digital Collections of Early Print. We Propose to Investigate the Relationship Between Digitized Early Print and Its Material Source. Our Project Thus Responds to Recent Calls in Digital Bibliography to Treat Digitized Documents as Distinct Bibliographic Objects. Building From Preliminary Research, We Examine the Effect of Material Versus Digital-born Features of Page Images for Improving Model Performance. Our Project Will Produce Several State-of-the-art Handwriting Detection Models, Evaluated for Bibliographic Research Tasks. We Will Release These Models With Accompanying Code and Documentation for Use by Students, Researchers, and Librarians.]
Committed
$150,000
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…