Federal grant · project grant (b)
Environment, Mutation, Cancer: a History of the Ames Test [from the 1960S to the 1980S, Cancer Was Predominantly Viewed as an Environmental Disease, One That Could Be Controlled by Regulating Exposure to Carcinogenic Chemicals. My Book Examines These Ideas From the Lab Bench Up, by Following the Trajectory of an Influential Petri Dish Test (the ?ames Test?) Used to Identify Potential Cancer-causing Substances. the History of the Ames Test Provides a Prism for Viewing Both the Changing Landscape of Cancer Biology and the Struggle Between Environmentalists and Industry Over Us Chemicals Regulation, in Which Testing Requirements Became a Political Battleground. at the Same Time, the Preoccupation With Cancer-causing Mutations That Had Prompted the Invention of the Test Carried Over Into the Human Genome Project and the Concurrent Emphasis on Managing Cancer Risk Through Lifestyle. by the 1990S, Mutations Were Viewed Personal Burdens More Than Environmental Threats, Reflecting a Broader Shift From Protective Regulation to Neoliberal Governance.]
Committed
$60,000
Paid out
$30.0K
50%
Committed, not yet paid
$30.0K
50%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…