Federal grant · project grant (b)
Ordering Property: a Global History of Maritime Prize Law, 1498-1916 [ordering Property Charts the Global Rise and Fall of Maritime Prize Law From 1498 Through the Aftermath of the American Civil War. Prize Courts, Which Had Jurisdiction Over Enemy Property Seized in Wartime, Became a Principal Forum for Private Property Disputes Between the Subjects of Different Empires During the Early Modern Era. This Made Them a Key Site for Creating and Enforcing Law Among Polities. Prize Courts Created Trans- and Inter-imperial Legal Orders as a Routine Part of Their Work. Empires Used Prize Jurisdiction to Extend Their Authority Into Regions in Which Imperial Institutions Were Weak. Prize Became a Powerful But Flawed Mode of Inter-imperial Governance, Central to Efforts to End the Atlantic Slave Trade, Shape European Colonization in Asia, and Decide the Outcome of the Americas? Independence Struggles. the Project Reveals a Largely Forgotten History of Inter-imperial Governance via Private Property Relations in the Era Before Modern International Law.]
Committed
$60,000
Paid out
$25.0K
42%
Committed, not yet paid
$35.0K
58%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…