Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
The Starfish Call for a Space Strategic Technical Institute Focuses on "core Technologies" Necessary to Improve Space Access, Mobility, and Logistics. Where These Functions Might Look Similar to the Needs of Civilian Agencies (nasa, Noaa, Etc) , Our Proposed Institute for In-space Operations Targets the Unique Needs of the Afrl and Us Space Force, Specifically Those Identified Technologies to Be Used When in Conflict With a Technologically Advanced Adversary. Technical Volume, the Goals for the Proposed Institute Are to Address Three Major Needs: Development of New Capabilities, Tools, Tactics, and Training Needed for In-space Operations. Infusion of New Technologies Into Industrial Efforts and Government Laboratories. Access to Workforce/talent and Subject Matter Experts Needed for Defense Space Missions.
Committed
$18.2 Million
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…